Culture has become a key regulatory theme, as regulators promote a ‘good corporate culture’ and take culture into account in their supervision work and when deciding on enforcement measures. It is considered part of a good culture when employees are willing to report irregularities they encounter.

A culture of speaking up v a culture of silence

The corporate culture determines how individuals act and ultimately how the organisation performs. To understand the corporate culture one needs to understand the dynamics within the organisation. Regulators assess these dynamics by looking at various factors:

  • a positive tone at the top;
  • personal accountability;
  • effective communication and challenge;
  • incentive for good behaviour;
  • an effective response when things go wrong.[1]

If there are positive dynamics within the organisation this will likely result in an open culture in which employees speak up if they encounter irregularities and lessons are learned from mistakes. In organisations where there is a less open culture, however, or even a culture of silence where people fear the consequences of speaking up, a formal whistleblower procedure may be necessary to improve the corporate culture.

Stepped-up whistleblower legislation

For this reason many jurisdictions are introducing whistleblower legislation and regulations to encourage the reporting of concerns and to further a culture of compliance.

In February 2017 the European Parliament adopted a (non-binding) resolution urging the European Commission to deliver a legislative proposal which establishes a minimum level of protection of whistleblowers in the EU. The European Parliament also advocates setting up an independent EU body which is similar to the Dutch House for Whistleblowers.[2] In response, the European Commission launched a public consultation on whistleblower protection on 3 March 2017, which will end on 29 May 2017.

Whereas in many European countries whistleblower laws focus on a proper procedure and a certain level of protection for whistleblowers, under the Whistleblower Program of the US the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC“) whistleblowers that report violations of the federal securities laws which lead to successful enforcement actions are actually rewarded.[3] According to FD, since its introduction the SEC has paid out USD 153 million to whistleblowers.[4] Of all reports made to the SEC 3-4% are made by whistleblowers located in the EU, including the Netherlands.[5]

Dutch House for Whistleblowers Act

The Dutch House for Whistleblowers Act that entered into effect last year is unique in the sense that the Act applies to all organisations that have at least 50 employees in the Netherlands. It is not limited to financial institutions like the whistleblower laws in the US and the UK. If organisations meet the 50 employees threshold they need to implement an internal whistleblower procedure.

Under the Act the whistleblower process consists of two phases. Phase one is to report internally so as to give the organisation the possibility to respond to the irregularities. If the organisation does not respond to the report within a reasonable term or does not take action, the whistleblower can report the wrongdoing to the relevant authorities which will then assess the report.[6]

Ways to ensure an effective internal reporting procedure

Since the introduction of the Whistleblower Act, many organisations have updated their whistleblower policy. In addition to this and in line with the broader compliance programme, it is essential to continually monitor and review its functioning to ensure an effective whistleblower procedure. This includes assessing whether:

  • the management team is encouraging and supporting employees to speak up;
  • there are adequate reporting frameworks and whistleblower procedures in place;
  • employees are aware of the whistleblower procedures (by way of training);
  • there is a clear step-by-step plan on how to deal with tips from whistleblowers;
  • the organisation adequately follows up on reports, investigates and takes measures.

An effective internal reporting procedure encourages employees to help protect the integrity of the organisation and create an environment of compliance. Furthermore, good corporate culture may prevent the organisation from becoming a target of external whistleblower allegations and may be a mitigating factor in regulatory enforcement action.

About the authors:

Simone Peek

Simone Peek

Sabien Schipper

Sabien Schipper

Simone Peek , Counsel, and Sabien Schipper, Associate, both work in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice of Clifford Chance in Amsterdam, where they are part of the Regulatory & Compliance Group.

 

 

 

 

 

[1] ‘Good culture what does it look like and how do you get there?’, Clifford Chance, May 2015.
[2] Press Release ‘MEPs call for EU-wide protection for whistle-blowers’, European Parliament, 14 February 2017.
[3] ‘US Regulatory Update: SEC Issues First Annual Whistleblower Report’, Clifford Chance, November 2011.
[4] Het Financieele Dagblad 28 april 2017 ‘Klokkenluiders VS ontvingen al $ 153 mln.’
[5] 2011 – 2016 Annual Reports to Congress on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program, SECC, 2011-2016.
[6] ‘Dutch House for Whistleblowers Act’, Clifford Chance, June 2016.